Headline in “Ynet Global” on 4th October 2026. “Israel’s religious turn risks transforming the conflict into a religious war” By Dr. Michael Milshtein (senior researcher at the Moshe Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University.)
Israel’s
religious turn risks transforming the conflict into a religious war
Dr Milshtein admits that “the
main challenge is fundamental Islam.” The Islamic faith prohibits returning
conquered land, which is understood to be an eternal patrimony for the global
Islamic nation, to infidels. He admits the best result we can hope for is
a hudna – a temporary truce with the Islamic faithful. He fails to mention that
theologically, a hudna is permitted to last only for as long as is necessary to
defeat and annihilate the enemy. That is the sole purpose of a hudna – time
required to overcome a strategic military disadvantage. Theologically, a
temporary truce should not last longer than ten years although it has never
prevented Muslim empires from using the absence of hostilities to massively
profit from the relationship, or even to develop alliances with infidel nations
against other Muslim nations. Dr. Milshtein does refer to a hudna being
inevitably broken by a 10/7 style attack (slaughter of the innocents).
Islamic extremists view a world
of constant conflict between the faithful and the rest. Violence, slavery, and
death are viewed as an appropriate 'lessons for those who fail to adhere to
inferior status.' If this sounds like classical Roman rule then you would be
right.
In classic Roman rule there was
no honour in not dominating your opponents. Acts of rape, torture, and mass
slaughter were not subject to morality or ethics (except when dealing with
fellow citizens and even then, acts of sedition cancelled out any rights a
citizen might 'enjoy'.) Violence was simply an aspect of domination and
control.
We should not reduce ourselves to
celebrating as our enemies do, the institutionalisation of malice. The
hostility of Ben Gvir and Moshe Feiglin are not Judaism. But to describe the
relationship between Israel and the new-Palestinians as anything less than a
religious war is also delusional.
10/7 should have taught us the
advisability of not succumbing to blind faith and especially, not to succumb to
secular naiveté.
We have been fighting a religious
war since we started to reassert our fundamental human rights in the nineteenth
century, not just in Israel.
The Green Party of England and
Wales are a political party dedicated to safeguarding the environment through
biodiversity and measures meant to rid the planet of man-made pollution.
Recently, they passed a policy motion (on 4 October 2026) that designated
Zionism as a form of racism. The resolution called for a one-state solution to
the Israel-Palestine Conflict. In Israel, approximately two million Muslims
enjoy greater human rights than the overwhelming majority of the 2 billion
Muslims found in the Muslim world. However, apparently, at least according to
demagogues and activists of the Green Party, Israel is an ethnocentric Jewish
nation while over two billion Muslims exist in a multiethnic paradise. At least
49 Muslim states are dictatorships, and most are ethnostates, but this is
deemed irrelevant to the Greens.
The Greens are a party of
fascism. They demand our human sacrifice on their altar of unity. It is the
classic antisemitic strategy. Hold up “the Jew” (now relabelled as a “Zionist”)
as uniquely evil and to hell with any of the contrary evidence. Hate is an
instrument, a vehicle that unifies the amoral masses – of all classes and
creeds. Of course, a creed is a system of religious beliefs, but organised hate
requires a scapegoat and the espousal of an unquestioning faith. This is the
essence of any quasi-religious, political fundamentalism. Facts are an
obstacle, a complication in the dissemination of a prejudiced narrative. A
person of hate does not need facts.
In contemporary society we
exclude any relevant information by a device called non-platforming, along with
the denial of safe spaces and use of intimidatory tactics such as doxing to
allow the “right-kind” of hate speech to flourish. This too is fascism.
It is bewildering but
intersectionality, a term its founder referred to as “a system of interlocking
oppressions” is used to create a new pyramid of oppression, fuelled by hatred,
and prejudice. It places the most vicious champions of the new apartheid – foot
soldiers and their masters, at the top of a new oppression pyramid. These are
the new “social-injustice warriors” of Islamic Extremism and the Fascist Left.
Their new system of injustice places Jews and 'Whites' in ‘their’ place at the
bottom of the pyramid. But Jews will usually be their initial target. It is
Cultural Colonialism; rapidly developing into a devolved system of
oppression and persecution.
Unsurprisingly, the bigot will
explain, as if talking to an infuriating simpleton (me) that fascism is
right-wing, not left-wing. But Fascism has never been restricted to a
geographic point on a compass. It is a mindset of replacement, silencing, the
lie as truth and the replaced truth as fiction. And modern-day ethical thinking
is framed in carefully delineated absolutes. So, Left is good, Right is bad.
Forget the Holodomor, the Khmer Rouge, Baathism, and the murderous atrocities
of the radical-Left’s exponents.
Jews are that easy target amongst
those political or religious groups that need to hate to survive. That is our
reality.
Fascism grants the outlier (Jew)
conditional human rights. This is an oxymoron but essential to the very healthy
financial position of the global Human Rights community. When one’s human
rights are conditioned on silence or on the parroting of a self-abnegating
story-line, and when any divergent opinion is ill-tolerated to the point of
intimidation, violence, and murder then this too is fascism.
The acceptance of our equal
rights in society should be non-negotiable but in the world of Islamist
extremism where hierarchies of dominance demand a continuous demonstration of
power, scapegoating is essential if dictatorships are to retain their hold on
power. It is the reason that the global (Selective) Human Rights community, led
by the United Nations Organisation is so selective in its apportionment of
rights. Appeasement is both financially lucrative and low-risk. Jews have
always been peripheral in numbers and divided. Therefore, we represent the
eternally easy target.
So, how to deal with an avalanche
of hate? How do we deal with a narrative of deception? In the 21st
Century, the only way to win a religious war is to not fight it.
Diplomacy will not work either
because we are too small in number. As a non-missionary faith, we will always
be thus. Being a marginal group makes us easy prey to the predator.
In a world that fears meaningful
engagement, while worshipping at the simpletons’ altar of social media, the
best way to fight a religious war is to rub their noses in their religious
hypocrisy, their bigotry, and their prejudice. When winning is dependent on
convincing others of your virtue, of proving to others your victimhood; and on
being the presumptive loser in an existential battle we must clarify the
muddied water and demonstrate the mendacity, the hate, and the malevolence of
our opponents. Because when we are dealing with a hate movement; when we are
dealing with a fascists’ antisemitic conspiracy there is only good and evil.
The entire strategy of our enemies is that we are evil incarnate -
unadulterated and irredeemable. The logical outcome is genocide. If that is
going to change, the stench has to transfer back onto our hate infused enemy.
There is no other way.
It is the only way to “convince”
others of our right to exist! It sounds obscene. IT IS. Only in a world
that has lost its way, only in a world of fascism do we have to convince our
oppressor that we too, have always had and still do have rights.
Our enemies like things simple
and binary: right and wrong, good verses bad. Duality not complexity. There is
nothing like a gaggle of elderly, white-haired Caucasians with a couple of
young children in tow, waving their banners or standing in gloomy silence to
impress the gullible with their passion for “justice.” At the turn of the
20th Century the British Foreign Office had the toxic reputation
(much envied) for being able to smile at you, while stabbing you in the back.
Britain has upped its game, several times since then. Laughably, they still
call us ‘friends’ even as they ignore and therefore encourage the violence
against us. Our streets have been colonised by the Blackshirts, the Greenshirts
and the Redshirts.
The power of the English and
Welsh Greens, and their admirers, is in their ability to express their hatred
openly. That is the reality of evil; non-philosophic and radical. Ignorance
dressed up as virtue. And that will always excite groups and ideologies like
HAMAS, Fatah, and the Greens. They are anything but exceptional.
No comments:
Post a Comment