The Greens, the Triumph of Fascism, and a Religious War

Headline in “Ynet Global” on 4^th October 2026. “Israel’s religious turn risks transforming the conflict  into a religious war” By Dr. Michael Milshtein (senior researcher at the Moshe Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University.)

Israel’s religious turn risks transforming the conflict into a religious war

Dr Milshtein admits that “the main challenge is fundamental Islam.” The Islamic faith prohibits returning conquered land, which is understood to be an eternal patrimony for the global Islamic nation,  to infidels. He admits the best result we can hope for is a hudna – a temporary truce with the Islamic faithful. He fails to mention that theologically, a hudna is permitted to last only for as long as is necessary to defeat and annihilate the enemy. That is the sole purpose of a hudna – time required to overcome a strategic military disadvantage. Theologically, a temporary truce should not last longer than ten years although it has never prevented Muslim empires from using the absence of hostilities to massively profit from the relationship, or even to develop alliances with infidel nations against other Muslim nations. Dr. Milshtein does refer to a hudna being inevitably broken by a 10/7 style attack (slaughter of the innocents).

Islamic extremists view a world of constant conflict between the faithful and the rest. Violence, slavery, and death are viewed as an appropriate 'lessons for those who fail to adhere to inferior status.' If this sounds like classical Roman rule then you would be right.

In classic Roman rule there was no honour in not dominating your opponents. Acts of rape, torture, and mass slaughter were not subject to morality or ethics (except when dealing with fellow citizens and even then, acts of sedition cancelled out any rights a citizen might 'enjoy'.)  Violence was simply an aspect of domination and control.

We should not reduce ourselves to celebrating as our enemies do, the institutionalisation of malice. The hostility of Ben Gvir and Moshe Feiglin are not Judaism. But to describe the relationship between Israel and the new-Palestinians as anything less than a religious war is also delusional.

10/7 should have taught us the advisability of not succumbing to blind faith and especially, not to succumb to secular naiveté.

We have been fighting a religious war since we started to reassert our fundamental human rights in the nineteenth century, not just in Israel.

The Green Party of England and Wales are a political party dedicated to safeguarding the environment through biodiversity and measures meant to rid the planet of man-made pollution. Recently, they passed a policy motion (on 4 October 2026) that designated Zionism as a form of racism. The resolution called for a one-state solution to the Israel-Palestine Conflict. In Israel, approximately two million Muslims enjoy greater human rights than the overwhelming majority of the 2 billion Muslims found in the Muslim world. However, apparently, at least according to demagogues and activists of the Green Party, Israel is an ethnocentric Jewish nation while over two billion Muslims exist in a multiethnic paradise. At least 49 Muslim states are dictatorships, and most are ethnostates, but this is deemed irrelevant to the Greens.

The Greens are a party of fascism. They demand our human sacrifice on their altar of unity. It is the classic antisemitic strategy. Hold up “the Jew” (now relabelled as a “Zionist”) as uniquely evil and to hell with any of the contrary evidence. Hate is an instrument, a vehicle that unifies the amoral masses – of all classes and creeds. Of course, a creed is a system of religious beliefs, but organised hate requires a scapegoat and the espousal of an unquestioning faith. This is the essence of any quasi-religious, political fundamentalism. Facts are an obstacle, a complication in the dissemination of a prejudiced narrative. A person of hate does not need facts.

In contemporary society we exclude any relevant information by a device called non-platforming, along with the denial of safe spaces and use of intimidatory tactics such as doxing to allow the “right-kind” of hate speech to flourish. This too is fascism.

It is bewildering but intersectionality, a term its founder referred to as “a system of interlocking oppressions” is used to create a new pyramid of oppression, fuelled by hatred, and prejudice. It places the most vicious champions of the new apartheid – foot soldiers and their masters, at the top of a new oppression pyramid. These are the new “social-injustice warriors” of Islamic Extremism and the Fascist Left. Their new system of injustice places Jews and 'Whites' in ‘their’ place at the bottom of the pyramid. But Jews will usually be their initial target. It is  Cultural Colonialism; rapidly developing into a devolved system of oppression and persecution.

Unsurprisingly, the bigot will explain, as if talking to an infuriating simpleton (me) that fascism is right-wing, not left-wing. But Fascism has never been restricted to a geographic point on a compass. It is a mindset of replacement, silencing, the lie as truth and the replaced truth as fiction. And modern-day ethical thinking is framed in carefully delineated absolutes. So, Left is good, Right is bad. Forget the Holodomor, the Khmer Rouge, Baathism, and the murderous atrocities of the radical-Left’s exponents.

Jews are that easy target amongst those political or religious groups that need to hate to survive. That is our reality.

Fascism grants the outlier (Jew) conditional human rights. This is an oxymoron but essential to the very healthy financial position of the global Human Rights community. When one’s human rights are conditioned on silence or on the parroting of a self-abnegating story-line, and when any divergent opinion is ill-tolerated to the point of intimidation, violence, and murder then this too is fascism.

The acceptance of our equal rights in society should be non-negotiable but in the world of Islamist extremism where hierarchies of dominance demand a continuous demonstration of power, scapegoating is essential if dictatorships are to retain their hold on power. It is the reason that the global (Selective) Human Rights community, led by the United Nations Organisation is so selective in its apportionment of rights. Appeasement is both financially lucrative and low-risk. Jews have always been peripheral in numbers and divided. Therefore, we represent the eternally easy target.

So, how to deal with an avalanche of hate? How do we deal with a narrative of deception? In the 21^st Century, the only way to win a religious war is to not fight it.

Diplomacy will not work either because we are too small in number. As a non-missionary faith, we will always be thus. Being a marginal group makes us easy prey to the predator.

In a world that fears meaningful engagement, while worshipping at the simpletons’ altar of social media, the best way to fight a religious war is to rub their noses in their religious hypocrisy, their bigotry, and their prejudice. When winning is dependent on convincing others of your virtue, of proving to others your victimhood; and on being the presumptive loser in an existential battle we must clarify the muddied water and demonstrate the mendacity, the hate, and the malevolence of our opponents. Because when we are dealing with a hate movement; when we are dealing with a fascists’ antisemitic conspiracy there is only good and evil. The entire strategy of our enemies is that we are evil incarnate - unadulterated and irredeemable. The logical outcome is genocide. If that is going to change, the stench has to transfer back onto our hate infused enemy. There is no other way.

It is the only way to “convince” others of our right to exist! It sounds obscene. IT IS. Only in  a world that has lost its way, only in a world of fascism do we have to convince our oppressor that we too, have always had and still do have rights.

Our enemies like things simple and binary: right and wrong, good verses bad. Duality not complexity. There is nothing like a gaggle of elderly, white-haired Caucasians with a couple of young children in tow, waving their banners or standing in gloomy silence to impress the gullible with their passion for “justice.”  At the turn of the 20^th Century the British Foreign Office had the toxic reputation (much envied) for being able to smile at you, while stabbing you in the back. Britain has upped its game, several times since then. Laughably, they still call us ‘friends’ even as they ignore and therefore encourage the violence against us. Our streets have been colonised by the Blackshirts, the Greenshirts and the Redshirts.

The power of the English and Welsh Greens, and their admirers, is in their ability to express their hatred openly. That is the reality of evil; non-philosophic and radical. Ignorance dressed up as virtue. And that will always excite groups and ideologies like HAMAS, Fatah, and the Greens. They are anything but exceptional.

The Madrid Bombings and Islamism’s successful Western Colonial Project

 or How the new-Palestinians learnt to Gaslight Jews on Everything.

On the 11^th of March 2004 at 07:37 a.m. Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network exploded ten bombs on four Madrid bound commuter trains murdering 193 people (including Spaniards and people from sixteen other nations). The coordinated terrorist attacks seriously injured some 2,500 people. Osama bin-Laden immediately took direct responsibility for the attacks. Each bomb that was used held no less than ten kilograms of dynamite and about 700 grams of shrapnel. It was meant to be a mass casualty event which, if it did not kill, would permanently damage the greatest number of human beings. It led directly to the defeat of the incumbent Peoples Party and the successful rise to power of the Socialists Workers party.

Acting on behalf of al Qaeda, bin Laden instructed ‘Europe’ to return Al-Andalus (those sections of Spain and Portugal governed by Muslims between 711 and 1492 CE)  also known as the Iberian Peninsula, to Islamic ownership, if, that is, Europeans wanted to ‘immunize’ their nations against ‘Islamic anger.’ As continuation of a five-hundred-year-old historical grievance it was breathtakingly hypocritical. It had never prevented Islam from conquering and enslaving whole races and nations.

What did Osama bin-Laden mean? And is this a universal Muslim theological idea?

According to Islam, no land, previously conquered (or declared to be ‘Islamic inheritance’) may be returned to non-Muslim ownership. To adopt the present-day vernacular – this isn’t just imperialism; this is settler-colonialism taken to an extreme of ever-lasting domination and control. No non-Muslim may exercise either self-determination or anything other than conditional and selective human rights in such lands. This ‘Peace’ has been inevitably and infrequently interrupted by pogrom and slaughter.

According to Islamic theology, as a missionary faith the superiority of the Muslim male is eternal and unconditional. It leads directly into the logic of eliminationism. Structural aspects of human conflict and selective human rights speak falsely of Muslim victimhood and thus places them at the pinnacle of an intersectional hierarchy.

Critical theory makes Islam the most entitled, the most privileged group in Western society and in a material world that posits the idea that “money cures all ills” Western states have failed to demand reciprocity of any kind. No reciprocal tolerance, respect, or love of thy neighbour. Just never-ending hatred, transplanted onto Western soil.

Critical theory in colonial studies has largely gaslit Jewish history. It has succeeded in placing Jews  at the bottom of the human rights pyramid. It is the only way the big lie can work. Google the meaning.

  Gaslighting:

1.  It trivialises feelings: dismissing a victim’s emotions as “too sensitive,” “crazy,” or “irrational.”

2.      Blocking or diverting (think cancel culture).

3.    Projection: shifting blame by accusing the victim of the very abusive behaviour they are committing

4.      Gradual implementation: creating a pattern of abuse.

There is a reason that the above, from google, ends with the following statement:

The National Domestic Violence Hotline can Provide Support.

These are the tactics employed in our colonized universities and our colonized public spaces against the Jewish Community.

Systematic denialism is fascism defined. It is structural and routinely abusive behaviour. To systematically replace the objective reality; rewriting Muslim – new-Palestinian history to benefit their narrative of victimhood. This isn’t about a war HAMAS lost and its appalling consequences. It is about an irredentist theology of hatred towards non-Muslims that will deny every attempt at reconciliation or resettlement.

Jews are cancelled; our rights are restricted - defined and dependent on denying ourselves every constitutional human right allowed to others unless we embrace a faux narrative that criminalises our co-religionists. Safe spaces are to be denied to us. Only so-called “White people” are to be denied that same safe-space, but it is more difficult, at the present time to deny them the other rights we (Jews) are denied precisely because White people are the majority and self-abnegation is counter-intuitive to survival.

This then, is the woke terrorism of contemporary political life. This is the contemporary narrative that for far too many people holds every act of violence in a warm glow of anti-Jewish self-righteousness. A spider-web of controls – “specifically rigid, intersecting systems of language, gender, spatial colonisation and personal manipulation that dictate human behaviour,” creating rejection, fear, and ostracism for Jews and any of our supporters who refuse to embrace the primary Palestinian narrative of dispossession and its concomitant demand for a right of return.

This is, as Andrew Fox, an  expert in defence and disinformation calls it, the “manufactured reality” of the Free Palestine Movement.

James Baldwin pointed out that Jews could hide from their identity, so, if the “wrong” kind of Jew is labelled as a “Zionist” all Jews may be raped or murdered for the simple crime of being. Because Zionism is at its most fundamental, a utopian, universally applied philosophy, for all people and all faiths, its rejection represents the crime of Arab – Muslim particularism supported by White entitled racists, Christian progressive-  religious bigots, and the ever-present House Jew.

The one thing they have in common is that their ideology is fuelled by irrational but powerful hate. It does not require reason or truth to be embraced unconditionally. Breaking this global web of anti-Jewish oppression is the challenge of our generation.

In the USA, the (fascist) Radial Right argues that we (Jews) will not replace them. They do not mean numerically. As an overwhelmingly liberal community we support immigration and a robust regime of human rights legislation in action and not just words. This ‘behaviour’ is not limited to the U.S. But physical replacement is precisely what Islamists, and their Left-wing allies are imposing on the Jewish community.

Language is used to define identity, to take and hold onto power as an instrument of oppression. And just as HAMAS used and continues to use rape and sexual abuse as an instrument of dominance and oppression (this time, allegedly against its own women and female children in Gaza), it is the denial of this crime against women by the “Me-Too” movement, by Western feminists, by the radical-Left and by Islamists, of a (Jewish) right to protection that reinforces the language of oppression against Jews everywhere and incites violence and murder across the world.

Just a small example – in November 2023 UN employee and communist ideologue Francesca Albanese stated that following on from the 10/7 Genocide, Israel had no rights to self-defence.  This is not a case of patriarchal dominance. Another example: A female Egyptian journalist, in a nation where over 80% of women seen out in public without a male escort are sexually assaulted, wrote in an Op-Ed that Muslim men must reach out to Jewish women and girls everywhere and rape them to “teach them a lesson” (because they might  support Israel.) I cannot foresee a situation where righteous Muslim males will first ask any woman for her religious affiliations, prior to raping her. Sophistication is rarely an attribute of violence.

Female Muslim scholars have said “Allah allows Muslim men to rape non-Muslim women to humiliate them. If we fight infidels, we can take their women as sex slaves and rape them.”

And yet the reaction of the United Nations, Amnesty International, the ICC, the ICJ and Human Rights Watch have been characteristically, thunderously silent in all of these cases. Post 10/7 the Me-Too movement, Jews for Palestine, entitled Muslims and Woke Whites everywhere have managed to ignore everything that took place on 10/7 as well as the ongoing and systematic violence of thought and  deed that has engulfed the Western world. Intimidation and the conquest of public spaces, violence – these are not aspects of freedom of expression. They are aspects of an abusive relationship, conditioning human rights on the denial of our communities’ human rights. And still, it manages to blame the victim in every case.

Jewish history is continuously erased in case it contradicts the acceptable narrative of a Jewish power structure that oppresses Muslims (as well as others). That, at least, is in harmony with antisemitic conspiracy theories put forward by missionary faiths determined to extinguish our light. How else can they explain why Arabs failed to annihilate us in 1948?

Structural as well as intermittent violence against Jews alongside of periodic expulsions kept the Jewish population of Israel low in pre-1948 Israel. But fascists always use our population in the late 19^th Century as the primary determinant for deciding we lack any right of immigration or refugee flight targeting the Land of Israel, when they usually also mean, anywhere else.

Surprisingly, the widespread conquest and colonisation by Islam of other nations is not considered a good reason to similarly, deny Muslims a right of immigration. There are fifty-eight Muslim nations, none of which appear to be favoured as targets for Muslims fleeing Muslim poverty or Muslim oppression. It does not occur to Western fascists of either side of the political compass or their allies, that denying Jews those same rights exhibit the all-pervasive stench of prejudice and antisemitism.

This is the narrative of oppression that Critical Race Theory (CRT) is supposed to guard against. CRT has sought to transform the relationship between race, racism and power but fails spectacularly because race is interchangeable with religion in defining aspects of the power relationship between peoples, nations, and civilisations.

Within the Islamic world, criticism of its religion is punishable by death. The Muslim nation here in the UK and at the UN have attempted to legislate (in the former, nationally and in the latter, globally) to ban criticism of Islam. In both cases it failed only when non-Muslim nations insisted, reasonably, the ban on criticism had to apply to all religious groupings, or none at all.

Symbolic violence, defined by Pierre Bourdieu, “manifests through the imposition of academic narratives on marginalized voices.” One could add, post 10/7 that academia has become the principal attack-dog providing intellectual - sociological justification behind real-world antisemitism and antisemitic violence. But then, hate is a wonderful unifier. It allows one to embrace every lie and justify every act of violence.

It is the abdication of morality where-ever and whenever the wrong kind of Jews are mentioned. That is at the heart of the intersection of anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

Islam and the radical Left (though increasingly it is the Left as a whole that identifies with this horrific prejudicial behaviour) have colonised social media, they have colonised the traditional media, they have colonised our universities and they have colonised all of our Public spaces. It has led to public-social ostracism through ongoing colonisation of the offices of the State. The painful truth, to quote the title of a book by British comedian David Baddiel,  “Jews Don't Count: How Identity Politics Failed One Particular Identity,” is that Jews really don’t count.

In electoral terms we are minnows. An epithet commonly used in British political circles, the “Jewish vote” used to be periodically employed as if it identified an exclusive Jewish  ‘alliance’ (cabal). It was a club used to beat down the ‘uppity Jew,’ usually, but not exclusively, at election times. This prejudice has been completely absent from British political discourse on Islam. Islamic infiltration into Western political parties and those parties’ programs reflecting an increasingly extremist Muslim bigotry is tolerated and even encouraged. This explains the absence of any serious action against hate-speech and violence - in particular see the hateful Green Party of England and Wales which is today, barely cognizant of the environment. (Gaza rules.)

It makes sense that the Police will not get involved when Muslims and their White-entitled allies, protest violently near our schools and places of worship, or anywhere else. The numbers involved make any confrontation dangerous for the Police (and innocent non-Jewish passers-by.) Better to tell the Jew(s) to shut up and **** off. But that knowledge is powerful. It translates into action. Muslims and White racists are able to employ violent and destructive tactics (see Palestine Action) and are untouchable, “giving a green light to mob violence in pursuit of political objectives.” (thesecretbarrister.com).

One final example of how both the police and the courts (no doubt through government instructions) empowers violence in society: Six Palestine Action fascists broke into an Israeli factory in the UK and one of their number violently assaulted a female guard. He then raised his sledgehammer over his head and deliberately brought it down on her spine. Two Supreme court judges ruled that the six assailants from Palestine Action did not have a case to answer for. And let them go. Ergo, it is realistic to assume that assault including murder is no longer a criminal offence in the UK if it is carried out for political purposes.  Note: They were convicted, later in a re-trial.

Jews / Zionists are the perfect patsy. As members of a non-missionary faith our numbers will always be small and therefore accessible to structural violence without consequence. We are large enough to be visible but tiny enough to be unable to defend ourselves. Except in Israel, which is why they, our enemies, expend so much energy creating the structural, intellectual, and public framework for genocide. Anti-Zionism will always bleed into antisemitism.

Entitled and privileged groups of self-interested purveyors of hate with interlocking agendas need to be able to feed off each other in order to legitimise their actions and words .

The current alliance between primarily Left-wing, White-entitled racists, and Muslims is an existential threat to Jewish peoplehood because of the enormous numbers of people engaged in its program of hatred and lies. How then is the Palestinian war against Jewish independence different from previous attempts at exclusion, delegitimization, and expulsion from society - as a precursor to genocide?