I have been reading with
interest the recent flurry of articles about IDF abuses – there was one article
about hazing (the practice of harassing or physically abusing a new recruit or
low ranking soldier) in which one soldier almost died, another mocked a units long
held tradition of individuals carrying a small vessel around their necks – we
won’t discuss what was allegedly stored inside each vessel. There have been other
controversies but the latest article (as reported in Ynet news) concerns an
initiative undertaken by an Israeli organisation called “Breaking the Silence”
whose aim it is to shed light on the abuses suffered by enemy youth at the hand
of Israeli soldiers. In the organisations
own words:
“Deterioration of moral standards finds expression in the character of
orders and the rules of engagement, and is justified in the name of Israel’s
security. While this reality is known to Israeli soldiers and commanders,
Israeli society continues to turn a blind eye and to deny that which is done in
its name”.
The down side is that at the
time of the UN Goldstone Report fiasco “Shovrim Shtika” (its Hebrew name) was
wholly foreign funded and supplied Goldstone’s investigators with information
later proven to be fabricated but which succeeded in damning Israel internationally.
I read a commentary on the
latest revelations in the British national newspaper “The Independent.” Next to the article was another article but about the Holocaust.
(“The Holocaust: How relevant is it to today’s society?”) The juxtaposition was
deliberate. If there is one reason to hate “The Independent” - it is its
insensitivity and reprehensible bias.
I do not believe that submitting
the report to the army before publicly releasing it would have generated a
response that addresses the issues that are raised. Any organisation faced with systemic failures
will prioritise its budget to addressing what is important to its survival and
not what it regards as either peripheral or inessential to its continued vitality. But what is at issue is that unchecked power
corrupts and without the application of ethical controls any organisation will
lapse into morally dubious practices on an institutional level.
The more serious consequence is
that it is unreasonable to assume a delineation of boundaries between work and
private life.
I know that Israeli soldiers do
acts of amazing kindness towards our enemy and theirs under extreme conditions
of threat and violence. But this is
neither going to be reported nor if it was, would it assist in countering the
propaganda value that a negative story presents.
All the excuses in the world do
not negate the obvious –I do not care what the Arab world thinks about me. I do
care about the ethical well being of Israeli and Western society. Prolonged conflict desensitises everybody to
the harm done to society’s values.
Remorse is of no consequence if we are unable to address the wider issue
of power and its misuse.
This is a very difficult issue to address; Morality in times of war! The IDF is known as the most moral army in the world, but no one or no system is perfect! I abhor the hazing more than I abhor the immoralities that take place between the IDF and the Palestinian community. Neither are right...Hazing is unforgivable. Unfortunately hazing takes place in a great many organisations... even on University campuses throughout the world ( have yet to hear of it happening in an Israeli University). But again, as much as Israel/Jews are SUPPOSED TO BE PERFECT, it's not the case. So yes, the human side of the IDF never hits the media because it's not "interesting". The conquerers and and war mongers are never projected as "nice and humane". The provocative side of the Palestinians never hits the media, because seeing the "underdog" as the provocateur, is not what the reader wants to see. And as far as hazing is concerned, it should be dealt with with an iron fist ( which it is done) and it should not hit our frontpage headlines..because then it becomes fodder for those who are looking to sink us even further!
ReplyDeletehazing is all part of the same issue in terms of abuse of power. 'No one' (except Israel's friends) cares about 'most moral army' - its purpose makes it a bit of an oxymoron - and those who want to demonise Israel will use it as a weapon against Israel.
Delete