Search This Blog

Saturday, January 21, 2017

Donald Trump, Deplorables, Democrats and Danger to Democracy

A failure of democracy occurs when a lawfully elected individual is denied legitimacy by his or her opponent who then continues to agitate for that non-recognition. It is not fascism to disagree with a result, nor is fascism defined by a desire to want to change the present system of government or the electoral system. But when a consistent policy of questioning; of undermining a result in order to repudiate that result, occurs, then eventually violence will become a logical call to arms in defence of opposition to what will be seen, to be, an unjust result.

The suppression of free speech is a key component of the fascists bag of tricks. There are many ways to suppress free speech and I am not calling for it. I would however, like to provide people with one of the myriad definitions of fascism, with thanks to Zack Parker: In its simplicity and categorical consistency, in its visceral emotion and outrage, and, in its stereotyping, (in this case, by the labelling by Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, of Republican voters as ‘the Deplorables’) it places into a category of (sub) humanity those people who voted for Donald Trump - (‘the enemy’).

All this makes it much easier to establish a narrative of grievance, to ennoble that narrative and then, to suppress any opposition to the only ‘correct’ narrative, in the name of fairness. All this is what makes it fascism. Today, the Democrat Party is the polite face of fascism.

It is not to say that the opposition to President Donald Trump are wrong about the threat his populism poses, but equally, taking every opportunity to deny the legitimacy of the President of the United States not only threatens the life of that President but also damages the institution of the Presidency itself. Because the United States of America is the world’s leading democratic nation, discrediting one discredits all and in its place, strengthens the followers of fascism (and theocratic totalitarianism).

Ignoring the concerns of the everyman and the everywoman is not smart nor progressive but contemptuous. And that probably cost the Democrats the election. It isn’t rocket science. Calling 50% of the electorate “deplorables” was an unforgivable insult to 50% of the electorate. I am not comfortable with the idea that dismissing the result of the presidential election because they were uncomfortable with the persons personality (behaviour) is democratically acceptable. In fact it is fascism.

It is ironic that I accused Trumps supporters of inciting violence during the presidential elections (Donald Trump and the Race for the White House).

It is the Democrats who now pose the greatest threat to American interests at home and abroad. I feared Trumps supporters but it is now the Democrats I fear most.

It was decided that the Oxford dictionaries international word of the year for 2016 was post-truth.” It reflected the ‘highly-charged’ political environment of the previous 12 months. The Oxford Dictionary defined the word as an adjective ‘relating to circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than emotional appeals.’ Does it sound familiar? Post-truth is an integral tool in the spread of the fascist poison.

It is with some embarrassment that I find Jewish connections, even here. The Jewish people have been called ‘the canary in the coal mine’ for a very long time and it is because fascism targets their liberties first that it is always Jews and Judaism that initially, suffer most (because of their acute awareness of its corrosive impact on their human rights). The BDS movement has been enthusiastically embraced by Western universities. BDS is the ideal example of a fascist conspiracy to ‘own’ the truth and suppress at any cost, any and all contrary narratives. And it is only because of the success of the anti-Zionist narrative, which is in its essence, a ‘post-truth’ antisemitic movement, that the concept of post-truth has infiltrated and taken hold throughout the Western world. When the lie can so easily become the truth and the truth so easily becomes the lie then we are living George Orwell's dystopian future.

For decades journalists have been manufacturing the news. But while their target was only the Jewish State of Israel and its supporters, no one seemed to care. When Jews and Zionists have often been marginalised through violence and propaganda; through controlling the dissemination of largely false or inaccurate information via universities and international organisations, the response has been at best indifference and at worst, encouragement.

One of CNN’s reporters openly boasts that she has the right to choose how to interpret the news – she omits the detail that she and her fellow journalists reserve the right to manufacture the news based on their unequal interpretation of an ethical standard that would never be acceptable under a Western legal system. That legal system is theoretically anchored in the concept of equal justice for all. But if by laying claim to a progressive agenda, journalists can dismiss what is termed ‘an inconvenient truth’ and only report what they care about, then they also exercise the right to betray any person, group or nation they ‘decide’ are at fault.

I quote Christiane Amanpour: “There are some situations one simply cannot be neutral about, because when you are neutral you are an accomplice. Objectivity doesn’t mean treating all sides equally. It means giving each side a hearing,” so she argued in response to criticism. The issue here is that historically, journalism has rarely suffered honest reportage. As Christiane indicates by the above, that dishonesty is no different today.

I started this blog by discussing my fears about the failure of democracy. Many on the Left are crying that the Russian Federation has undermined American democracy though a putative, an alleged connection between Vladimir Putin (former director of the FSB) and Donald Trump. They fear a kleptocratic conspiracy between the Presidents of the Russian Federation and the United States of America! In a nation that is obsessed by conspiracies it is an unparalleled classic of deception. We can take issue with the President of the Russian Federation. It is always possible that the FSB (the main successor agency of the KGB) interfered in the US presidential elections. It is also possible that the FSB did nothing but leak disinformation implying that it interfered in those elections. The British Intelligence officer could also be part of a false flag operation meant to help to undermine American stability.

After all, in both the cases I refer to above, a destabilized America is a win for its rivals.

It is obvious that between prominent Democrats refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the 2016 presidential result and the media campaign against Donald Trump, American democracy is being undermined.

It is time to move on from the elections and stop denying the legitimacy of the result.


  1. Boy are you right. It's on both sides,There's the accusation that any individual supporting the right is either a fascist, a racist or an idiot. And anyone who's on the left either wants Sharia or is too dumb to know they're supporting Sharia. There was a day or two after the US election when the media realized that panting accusations of racism towards anyone who opposed Hillary may have harmed the media's credibility but that's over. Media self scrutiny has been replaced by an absolute assurance that America is in the same position as Germany was in 1933 when the new chancellor was appointed. My issue is issues. I can count the number of people on one hand who'll actually discuss an issue. Mention the possibility that there a link between Moslem migration and terrorism to a left winger and the word racism will invariably come up. Same with Brexit. Discuss the issue? Nope. Or mention there may be inequality in the the US to a right winger and you're a dupe of Obama. And all I can see is it's getting worse, gasping outrage, swearing in social media and cutting off friends who disagree is happening now. Maury may be right, I hope not, but it's not looking so good.

  2. Two things happened, Paris with 99 dead and Orlando with 49 dead. The left's response? It's hate crimes against the LGBT community and bring in more Syrian refugees. It may have been a tipping point. It became plain that anything would be used to validate the left's equality, oppressor/victim ideology even when there was room for discussion. Or especially when there was room for discussion. I'm sure that the left, the believers in the equality ideology feel that it's for good, I can hear them saying it at the LGTB dance at Pence's home, the women's marches and the destroy Trump rallies. I see gridlock, the passions have gone too far to step back. The left sees Nazis coming in the form of Trump and the right sees Nazis coming in the form of Iran promising to destroy the Jews with the bomb Obama helped them with. And if you think Nazis are coming you probably think that those who disagree are dangerous to you and your family. My guess is that this gridlock will be resolved by an unforeseen coming event. A surprise of history.

  3. Just want to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your publish
    is simply excellent and i can suppose you are a professional in this subject.
    Fine along with your permission allow me to take hold of your feed
    to stay up to date with impending post. Thank you 1,
    000,000 and please continue the rewarding work.

  4. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide
    credit and sources back to your weblog? My website is in the very same area of
    interest as yours and my visitors would certainly benefit
    from some of the information you present here. Please let
    me know if this okay with you. Thanks!

  5. This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger.
    I've joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent post.
    Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!